Queensland University of Technology   Brisbane Australia Skip bannerSkip to content A university for the real world - Institute for Sustainable Resources
QUT Home
Contact us
ISR Home
About Us
Research & Programs
Research Affiliates
Publications and Tools
Events
Members' Login

Students: Roy Monaghan

Research Affiliates
Key QUT Researchers
Grants, Scholarships and Vacancies
Adjunct Professors
Research Links
Affiliated Postgraduate Students
  Stuart Bell
  Fiona Cheung
  Rebekah Davis
  Andrew East
  Michelle Gane
  Nandika Miguntanna
  Eric Too
  Sandra Beach
  Suzanne Campin
  Cameron Murray
  * Roy Monaghan
  Megan Tones
  Karleen Gwinner
  Jason Wimmer
  Justine Bell
  Rowena Maguire
  Eleanor Adamson
  Lin Chaofeng
  Benjamin Cumming
  Margaret Donald
  Pavel Dvoracek
  Jane Hodgkinson
  Sandra Johnson
  Matthew Krosch
  Genevieve Larsen
  Stefan Loehr
  Rebecca O'leary
  David Rowlings
  Vivien Rudorfer
  Mark Stanaway
  Anh Tho Tien
  Qing Wang
  Darren Wraith
Madeleine Sternberg

[Print-friendly version]

Roy Monaghan

Roy Monaghan

Faculty of Education, Centre for Learning Innovation


Thesis Title: Strengthening and Sustaining Governance Processes in a remote Indigenous community – a constructivist grounded theory approach


Current Thesis Abstract: The proposed study was motivated by a number of stimuli: the researcher’s personal experiences with Indigenous communities and groups working towards self-determination; a desire to document the processes employed by the community in response to the recent changes in legislation with the introduction of the Local Government (Community Government Areas) Act 2004 which effectively elevated Aboriginal Shire Councils to Local Government status; to discover what processes inhibit or enable ‘good governance’ in a remote discrete DOGIT community and the desire to a develop a substantive level theory concerning governance that can be used by a DOGIT community to improve outcomes for themselves and for others living in similar situations.

Indigenous communities and community based organisations have been widely criticized for their seeming inability to effectively govern their operations to satisfactorily meet the expectations of two of their key stakeholders: the Indigenous communities they serve, and the providers of funding (O’Donoghue, 1997; Turner, 1996)

The proposed study will examine the processes of governance concerning law and order in a remote Indigenous community, using a constructivist grounded theory methodology to (1) attempt to generate substantive level model or theory about why governance continues to problematic for remote discrete Indigenous communities and their inhabitants and (2) to inform policy makers to assist decision making in government, but perhaps more importantly, at the community level. The proposed study will involve the use of a qualitative methodology and techniques for the collection and analysis of data concerning governance processes to ascertain the full range of reasons governance continues to remain problematic in these communities.

The actual research process followed will be dependent on the community and will in some respects emerge as the study progresses. It is anticipated the research will address the following questions:

  • How knowledgeable are Indigenous community members of what constitutes good governance?


  • To what extent do clan and familial imperatives impact on the achievement or otherwise of good governance within a community?


  • What obstacles exist in the Indigenous community and within government agencies and structures that hinder or prevent the achievement of good governance outcomes for Indigenous communities in remote discrete areas.


  • How well are government priorities concerning Indigenous community governance disseminated throughout Indigenous communities and are they relevant to the day to day lives of Indigenous people and does this relevance have an impact on governance outcomes?


  • If Indigenous communities wanted to create or alter current community governance structures, what knowledge, information and resources would they require to make informed decisions about the new structure.